Index

PF2

Frameworks

Comparisons

TOGAF and Zachman
Misunderstanding
Criteria
Raw Scores
Overall
Example Weightings 1
Example Weightings 2

TOGAF

Now What
Content vs Benefits
Overall
ADM
Other Frameworks
Other Detail
Guidance vs Detail
Trends

Zachman

Basic Message
Missing Perspective and Model
Overall
Architect Engineer
Why How
How When What Where Who
Perspectives and Models
       
Click a Thumbnail to read the component. Hold down Ctrl while clicking to expand the image

 

TOGAF - Comparing POET and PEAF to TOGAF and Zachman


  .           ►►► PF2>Frameworks>Comparisons>TOGAF-and-Zachman>Misunderstanding

Here we present a method of categorising frameworks and ontologies.

The vertical axis ranges between the Theoretical and the Concrete, while the horizontal axis ranges between the Simple and the Complex.

The green area illustrates an area of balance between these extremes, where the 80/20 rule applies and a good balance between simplicity and complexity and between theory and concreteness is achieved.

 ...to read more, please Login or Register

Enroll to Self Study Now!         ►►► PF2>Frameworks>Comparisons>TOGAF-and-Zachman>Misunderstanding

Keypoint

Adopt this component by...

POET and PEAF bridge the chasm between Zachman and TOGAF.

Management: Use POET and PEAF to bridge the chasm between Zachman and TOGAF.

Questions to ponder...

Do you agree with this method of categorisation?

If not, why not and how would you draw the diagram?

Where would you place the Frameworks you currently use on this diagram?

Where would you put Zachman?

Where would you put TOGAF?

Where would you put POET?

Where would you put PEAF?

How do other frameworks you use fit?

What do you use to bridge the gaps between them?

© 2008-2021 Pragmatic 365 Ltd         A Non-Profit dedicated to improving Transformation, and the lives of people that work in Transformation.