Index

PF2

Frameworks

Comparisons

TOGAF and Zachman
Misunderstanding
Criteria
Raw Scores
Overall
Example Weightings 1
Example Weightings 2

TOGAF

Now What
Content vs Benefits
Overall
ADM
Other Frameworks
Other Detail
Guidance vs Detail
Trends

Zachman

Basic Message
Missing Perspective and Model
Overall
Architect Engineer
Why How
How When What Where Who
Perspectives and Models
       
Click a Thumbnail to read the component. Hold down Ctrl while clicking to expand the image

 

TOGAF - Comparing POET and PEAF to TOGAF and Zachman


PF2>Frameworks>Comparisons>Zachman>Architect-Engineer ◄◄◄           .           ►►► PF2>Frameworks>Comparisons>Zachman>How-When-What-Where-Who

Firstly, at a general level, POET recognises that Why and How actually exist from level to level rather than just as a column. For each level, How that level is achieved is defined by the level below it and Why that level is the way it is, is defined by the level above it.

 ...to read more, please Login or Register

PF2>Frameworks>Comparisons>Zachman>Architect-Engineer ◄◄◄         Enroll to Self Study Now!         ►►► PF2>Frameworks>Comparisons>Zachman>How-When-What-Where-Who

Keypoint

Adopt this component by...

Zachman’s Why and How columns, only equate to the Motivation and Actions of MAGMA.

Why and How are also questions answered by moving up and down the rows, not columns.

Enterprise Architect: Be aware that Zachman’s Why column contains Means (How) and Ends (Why), and the How column relates to the Methods of the thing in question, not the How of Transformation.

Questions to ponder...

Do you agree that Zachman’s Why and How columns are a little strange?

If not, how would you map these things?

© 2008-2021 Pragmatic 365 Ltd         A Non-Profit dedicated to improving Transformation, and the lives of people that work in Transformation.