https://www.pragmatic365.org/display-show.asp?ComponentNo=000418
Since Idealisation/Realisation is the key type of abstraction related to Transformation, do you think that meta-models should explicitly define and state which entities are associated with which levels of idealisation/realisation?
If not, what will you use to describe structural information in a way that enables transformation?
If it is not defined, what problems do you think will result?
https://www.pragmatic365.org/display-show.asp?ComponentNo=000418
FREE EA Training at www.PEAF.com/Training
FREE EA Books at www.PEAF.com/Books
#PEAF #PragmaticEA #EntArch #enterprisearchitecture #BizArch #Change #Innovation #BusinessModel #CEO #Strategy #TOGAF #ITgovernance #agileculture #agile #agileleadership #agilemethodology #itstrategy #ceos
In the past, people only saw part of the picture – they considered only Structural information.
https://www.pragmatic365.org/display-show.asp?ComponentNo=000418
Keypoint |
Adopt this component by... |
In the past, people only saw part of the picture – they considered only Structural information.
|
|
Questions to ponder... |
Since Idealisation/Realisation is the key type of abstraction related to Transformation, do you think that meta-models should explicitly define and state which entities are associated with which levels of idealisation/realisation? |
If not, what will you use to describe structural information in a way that enables transformation? |
If it is not defined, what problems do you think will result? |
